Emphasising risk in patient information (ID REC14)
Evidence Summary
What is it?
Participants are presented with a version of the study protocol that explicitly describes all possible risks of injury.
Does it work?
Emphasising risk in information may make little or no difference to recruitment.
How big is the effect?
An increase of 0% (95% confidence interval = -1% to 1%).
How certain are we?
GRADE Low certainty.
Recommendation
We recommend that trialists emphasise risk in patient information in the context of an intervention evaluation.
How can I use this straight away?
See Resource bundle below for details of how to emphasise risk in patient information.
Practical Impact
Imagine a trial that needs to recruit 30 participants and initial recruitment is 30% of those approached. This means you’d need to approach 100 people to recruit 30 of them (see chart).
Now imagine emphasising risk in patient information. The chart below shows the impact of an absolute increase of 0% (95% CI = -1% to 1%). Recruitment is still 30%, which means our best estimate is still that 100 people would now need to be approached to recruit 30 of them.
Cumulative Meta-Analysis*
Resource Bundle
How to Cite
More Information
- This summary is from the Cochrane review of strategies to improve recruitment in randomised trials (https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.MR000013.pub6).
- It was prepared with financial support from Evidence Synthesis Ireland.
- The ‘Does it work?’ statement is structured according to effect size and GRADE certainty as per GRADE Guidelines 26 (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.10.014). The statement is for a trivial, small unimportant or no effect size and GRADE Low certainty.
- The recommendation statement is the consensus view of the authors of this summary based on the GRADE certainty and features of the trials contributing to the evidence.
- If you have any questions contact info@trialforge.org.
